Every fix reveals another issue.
The visible bug is often a symptom of fragile state, tangled dependencies, or missing boundaries underneath.
Customers cannot log in. Jobs fail silently. Every fix breaks something else. We find the risks underneath your AI-built software, restore the workflows your business depends on, and strengthen the foundation for growth.
Keep the speed and ingenuity that got you here. Add the engineering discipline that gets you safely to what comes next.
Before we recommend fixes, we scan the full codebase and architecture to find the defects, risks, and production assumptions that are easy to miss from the interface alone.
You receive a concise, decision-ready report showing what is failing now, what creates the greatest business risk, and what should be addressed first.
Request a Production Readiness AuditA prototype only has to prove possibility. A production platform has to behave predictably under load, recover when something fails, protect customer data, and support the business without constant intervention.
The visible bug is often a symptom of fragile state, tangled dependencies, or missing boundaries underneath.
Registration, password resets, notifications, billing, and other essential workflows fail at the moments trust matters most.
Memory problems, failed scheduled tasks, silent errors, and manual workarounds keep the team in reaction mode.
More users and more data should be exciting. Instead, each new customer puts more pressure on an unstable foundation.
Healthcare and other regulated workflows need consistent access, audit, encryption, retention, and operational controls—not scattered assumptions.
Code exists, but the architecture, deployment path, failure modes, and ownership model are unclear.
We enter where the system actually is. First we protect the business from active failures. Then we create the technical clarity and production foundation the platform needs to scale.
We map architecture, infrastructure, data flows, third-party services, deployment practices, and critical user journeys. You get a risk-ranked recovery plan grounded in evidence.
We fix the failures blocking customers and consuming the business: unreliable state, failed jobs, broken access flows, missing observability, and unsafe operational gaps.
We refactor where it matters, document the system, strengthen delivery practices, and leave the platform ready for responsible feature growth.
Not a ground-up rewrite by default. Not a judgment on how the product began. A focused intervention that preserves what is useful and fixes what cannot safely carry the next stage of growth.
Customers can access the product, recover accounts, and complete the actions the business depends on.
Monitoring, logs, alerts, and ownership replace silent breakage and customer-reported surprises.
You know what must be fixed now, what can wait, and what investment the next growth stage actually requires.
Clear architecture, safer releases, documentation, and test coverage create a more durable development rhythm.
For healthcare platforms, we review the technical and operational safeguards that support HIPAA obligations across the full system—not just the obvious screens. That can include access controls, auditability, encryption, data handling, backups, vendors, incident response, and deployment practices.
FaasHaus provides technical architecture and implementation support. Legal interpretation, formal compliance determinations, and organizational policy remain the responsibility of qualified legal and compliance professionals.
You have moved beyond an experiment. Customers, revenue, operations, or sensitive data now depend on the application—and the current foundation is limiting what the business can safely promise.
You launched an AI-assisted or lightly engineered platform that is now showing production failures.
Your current developer can keep building features but needs seasoned architecture and production support.
You need to stabilize the product before investing in acquisition, onboarding more customers, or raising capital.
You need a clear answer about what to repair, what to refactor, and what—if anything—must be rebuilt.
Usually not. We begin with evidence, then preserve what is sound and intervene where risk, maintainability, or customer impact justifies the cost. If a rewrite is truly the responsible path, we will explain why and sequence it carefully.
Yes. This is often the best model. We can provide architecture, production engineering, review, and mentorship while the person who knows the product continues contributing.
Absolutely—where it improves speed without outsourcing judgment. We use AI as a capable tool inside an engineering process that still includes architecture, review, testing, security, and accountable human ownership.
We can assess and implement technical safeguards that support your HIPAA obligations, and work alongside your legal or compliance advisors. No developer should promise compliance based on code changes alone; it also depends on policies, operations, agreements, training, and ongoing governance.
Tell us what is failing and how it affects your customers. Jim or Kat will discuss the product, urgency, and access needed, then confirm the assessment scope and fee before work begins. Remediation is scoped separately.
If the prototype works and you want to prevent production problems before launch, start with our Prototype to Production offer.
Bring us the platform, the production problems, and what the business needs to do next. We will help you determine the responsible path from working prototype to dependable product.